Kenyan Government Defends Inspector General, Douglas Kanja Over Speech At Ruto’s Nyeri Rally

By Lisbeth Micheni, Kenya 

The Kenyan government has come to the defense of Inspector General (IG) of Police, Douglas Kanja after he faced criticism for addressing President William Ruto’s political rally in Nyeri.

The controversy has sparked debate over the independence of the police force, with critics accusing the IG of engaging in partisan politics.

Kanja, who recently took over as Kenya’s top police officer, was seen addressing the crowd at the event, a move that drew sharp reactions from opposition leaders and civil society groups.

Many argued that his actions undermined the neutrality of the police, which is mandated to serve all Kenyans regardless of political affiliation.

However, government officials dismissed the concerns, stating that Kanja’s presence at the rally was purely procedural.

They argued that it is standard practice for security chiefs to brief national leaders on security matters, especially at major public gatherings.

Interior Cabinet Secretary Kithure Kindiki emphasized that Kanja was simply carrying out his official duties, ensuring the safety of both the president and the public.

Opposition leaders, led by Azimio la Umoja politicians, have called for clear boundaries between the police and political activities.

“The police should not be used as a political tool. The Inspector General must remain impartial to maintain public trust,” said one opposition MP.

The incident has reignited concerns about the politicization of Kenya’s security agencies. In recent years, accusations of police being used to suppress opposition voices or favor certain political figures have surfaced repeatedly.

Analysts warn that such perceptions could weaken public confidence in law enforcement, making it harder for police to maintain order impartially.

As the debate continues, many are calling for stronger safeguards to ensure that security institutions remain professional and independent.

Whether Kanja’s actions were simply part of protocol or a sign of growing political interference in the police force remains a contentious issue.